The **Duality of Time Theory**, that results from the
**Single Monad Model of the Cosmos**, explains how *physical multiplicity* is emerging from absolute
(metaphysical) *Oneness*, at every instance of our normal time! This leads to the **Ultimate Symmetry** of space and its dynamic formation and breaking into the *physical* and *psychical* (supersymmetrical) creations, in orthogonal time directions. *General Relativity* and *Quantum Mechanics* are complementary **consequences** of the Duality of Time Theory, and all the fundamental interactions become properties of the new **granular complex-time geometry**, at diifferent dimensions. - **=> Conference Talk [Detailed Presentation]**

Particle-Wave Duality: from Time Confinement to Space Transcendence

In moving from Special to General Relativity, Einstein observed the equivalence between the gravitational force and the inertial force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. This is roughly the same as the equivalence between active gravitational and passive inertial masses, which has been later accurately tested in many experiments (Schlamminger et al., 2008; Reasenberg et al., 2012), but there is no direct mathematical derivation to this principle apart from the famous spacecraft accelerator thought experiment which relies on induction.

When Einstein combined this equivalence principle with the two principles of Special Relativity, he was able to predict the curved geometry of space-time, which is directly related to its contents of energy and momentum of matter and radiation, through a system of partial differential equations known as Einstein field equations.

We explained in Chapter V of
Volume II that an exact derivation of the mass-energy
equivalence relation *E=mc ^{2}* is not possible without postulating the
inner levels of time, and that is why there is yet no single exact
derivation of this celebrated equation. For the same reason indeed, there is
also no mathematical derivation of the equivalence principle that relates gravitation with geometry, because it is actually equivalent to the
same relation that reflects the fact that space and matter are always being
perpetually re-created in the inner time, i.e. fluctuating between the
particle state

Due to the discrete structure
of the genuinely-complex time-time geometry,
as illustrated in Figure III.4, the complex momentum *p* should be
invariant between inertial and non-inertial frames alike, because
effectively all objects are always at rest in the outer level of time. This
means that complex momentum is always conserved **even when the velocity**** changes**, i.e. as the object accelerates between non-inertial frames!

This invariance of momentum between non-inertial frames is conceivable, because it means that as the velocity increases (for example), the gain in kinetic momentum (that is the imaginary part) is compensated by the increase in the effective mass
due to acceleration, which causes the real part *p=mc* also to increase,
but since *p* is hyperbolic, thus its modulus remains invariant, and this what makes the geometry of space (manifested here as
*mc*) dynamic,
because it must react to balance the change in effective mass. Therefore, a
closed system is closed only when we include all its contents of mass and
energy (including kinetic and radiation) as well as the background space itself, which is the vacuum state
*(c, 0)*, and the momentum of all these
constituents is either *p=mc*, when they are re-created
in the inner levels, or *p=mv* for physical objects moving in the normal level of time. For such a conclusive system, the complex
momentum is absolutely invariant.

This absolute conservation
of complex momentum under acceleration leads directly to the equivalence
between active and passive masses, because it means that the total (complex)
force must have two components; one that is related to acceleration as *v*
changes in the outer time, which is the imaginary part, and this causes the
acceleration, so *m* here is the passive mass, while the other force is
related to the change in effective mass, or its equivalent energy *E=mc ^{2}*, which is
manifested as the deformation of space which is being re-created
in the inner levels of time, and this change or deformation is causing the
gravitational force that is associated with the active mass; and these two components must be equivalent so that the total resulting complex
momentum remains conserved. Therefore, gravitation is a reaction against the
disturbance of space from the ground state of bosonic vacuum

However, because of the fractal dimensions of the new complex-time discrete geometry, performing the differentiation of this complex function requires non-standard analysis because space-time is no longer everywhere differentiable (Nottale and Schneider, 1984). So this will not be pursued in this article.

From this conservation
of complex momentum we should be able to find the law of gravitation and the stress-energy-momentum tensor which leads to the field equations
of General Relativity. Moreover, since empty space is now described as the
dynamic aether, gravitational waves become the longitudinal vibrations in
this ideal medium, and the graviton will be simply the moment of time *mv*,
just as photons are the quanta of electromagnetic radiations and they are
transverse waves in this vacuum, or the moments of space *mc*. This
means that equivalence principle is essentially between photons and
gravitons, or between space and time, while electrons and some other
particles could be described as standing waves in the space-time; with
complex momentum *mc+jmv*, and the reason why we have three generations
of fermions is due to the three dimensions of space. This important
conclusion requires further investigation, but we should also notice here
that the equivalence principle should apply equally to all fundamental
forces and not only to gravity, because it is a property of space-time
geometry in all dimensions, and not only the *3D* where gravity is
exhibited, as it is also outlined in another publication (Haj Yousef,
2017).

## ... Monadology =>:

## ... Famous Spacecraft =>:

## ... Inertial Masses =>:

## ... Gravitational Waves =>:

## ... Curved Geometry =>:

## ... Einstein Combined =>:

## ... Direct Mathematical =>:

## ... Accurately Tested =>:

## ... Passive Inertial =>:

## ... Active Gravitational =>:

## ... Inertial Force =>:

## ... Einstein Observed =>:

... Space Transcendence Read this short concise exploration of the Duality of Time Postulate: DoT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics ...

... n later accurately tested in many experiments (Schlamminger et al., 2008; Reasenberg et al., 2012), but there is no direct mathematical derivation to this principle apart from the FAMOUS SPACECRAFT accelerator thought experiment which relies on induction. When Einstein combined t ...

... vitational force and the inertial force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. This is roughly the same as the equivalence between active gravitational and passive INERTIAL MASSES , which has been later accurately tested in many experiments (Schlamminger et al ...

... nd the law of gravitation and the stress-energy-momentum tensor which leads to the field equations of General Relativity. Moreover, since empty space is now described as the dynamic aether, GRAVITATIONAL WAVES become the longitudinal vibrations in this ideal medium, and the graviton will b ...

... cecraft accelerator thought experiment which relies on induction. When Einstein combined this equivalence principle with the two principles of Special Relativity, he was able to predict the CURVED GEOMETRY of space-time, which is directly related to its contents of energy and momentum of m ...

... asenberg et al., 2012), but there is no direct mathematical derivation to this principle apart from the famous spacecraft accelerator thought experiment which relies on induction. When Einstein combined this equivalence principle with the two principles of Special Relativity, he was a ...

... active gravitational and passive inertial masses, which has been later accurately tested in many experiments (Schlamminger et al., 2008; Reasenberg et al., 2012), but there is no DIRECT MATHEMATICAL derivation to this principle apart from the famous spacecraft accelerator though ...

... e experienced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. This is roughly the same as the equivalence between active gravitational and passive inertial masses, which has been later ACCURATELY TESTED in many experiments (Schlamminger et al., 2008; Reasenberg et al., 2012) ...

... the gravitational force and the inertial force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. This is roughly the same as the equivalence between active gravitational and PASSIVE INERTIAL masses, which has been later accurately tested in many experiments (Schlamminger et ...

... d the equivalence between the gravitational force and the inertial force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. This is roughly the same as the equivalence between ACTIVE GRAVITATIONAL and passive inertial masses, which has been later accurately tested in many exp ...

... nside this Book 3.4.2 The Equivalence Principle of General Relativity In moving from Special to General Relativity, Einstein observed the equivalence between the gravitational force and the INERTIAL FORCE experienced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. This is roughly the ...

... rom Time Confinement to Space Transcendence by Mohamed Haj Yousef Search Inside this Book 3.4.2 The Equivalence Principle of General Relativity In moving from Special to General Relativity, Einstein observed the equivalence between the gravitational force and the inertial force experienced ...

The science of Time is a noble science, that reveals the secret of Eternity. Only the Elites of Sages may ever come to know this secret. It is called the First Age, or the Age of ages, from which time is emerging.

ULTIMATE SYMMETRY - II.2 Symmetry and Super S...

ULTIMATE SYMMETRY - III.4.4 The Three Generat...

DUALITY OF TIME - Introduction: The Secret of...

DUALITY OF TIME - 3.4.5.12 Objective Co...

DUALITY OF TIME - Chapter II: Ancient Philoso...

DUALITY OF TIME - 6.2.1 Soul and Spirit...

The Significance of the Week in Theology and ...

Welcome to the Single Monad Model of the Cosmos and Duality of Time Theory

I have no doubt that this is the most significant discovery in the history of mathematics, physics and philosophy, ever!

By revealing the mystery of the connection between discreteness and contintuity, this novel understanding of the complex (time-time) geometry, will cause a paradigm shift in our knowledge of the fundamental nature of the cosmos and its corporeal and incorporeal structures.

*Enjoy reading... *

**Mohamed Haj Yousef**

Check this detailed video presentation on "Deriving the Principles of Special, General and Quantum Relativity Based on the Single Monad Model Cosmos and Duality of Time Theory".

Download the Book "DOT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics" or: READ ONLINE .....>>>>

Because He loves beauty, Allah invented the World with ultimate perfection, and since He is the All-Beautiful, He loved none but His own Essence. But He also liked to see Himself reflected outwardly, so He created (the entities of) the World according to the form of His own Beauty, and He looked at them, and He loved these confined forms. Hence, the Magnificent made the absolute beauty --routing in the whole World-- projected into confined beautiful patterns that may diverge in their relative degrees of brilliance and grace.