Continuous creation and renewal: SMM/DTT and Panpsychism and cosmopsychism

01The question behind the comparison

Continuous creation is a claim about dependence: the world does not sustain itself independently of its source once an initial act is finished. SMM/DTT develops a temporal version in which observable configurations are renewed through inner generation and outer completion. This can make persistence a dynamic achievement rather than the passive endurance of an unchanged material core. The central question is how novelty and reliable continuity coexist. A renewed world must explain why yesterday’s records constrain today’s events.

Renewal has several possible meanings. An entity may remain numerically the same while its properties change. A pattern may persist through replacement of its material components. A new token may reproduce an earlier form while inheriting a causal history. A metaphysical account may hold that all three depend continuously on a source without describing replacement in physical time. DTT is most distinctive when it specifies which of these meanings belongs to its generative law and which belongs to its theological interpretation. The difference matters for conservation laws and for the identity of persons.

The six inner levels should therefore include an account of retained structure, not merely a series of creative names. If nothing is retained, repeated creation produces disconnected worlds. If a complete archive is carried unchanged, the model must explain where that archive belongs and how its resources scale. A finite observer can preserve limited records while older details become inaccessible. This suggests a constructive middle ground: lawful renewal can preserve the relations required for stable experience without retaining every microscopic feature in every accessible record.

02The single-source and nested-time proposal

SMM begins with one nonspatial generative source. DTT distinguishes its inner production from the outer order in which completed results become accessible. The six inner levels are nested functional dependencies within that production; the seventh denotes outer completion. They are not six independent clocks, six spatial directions, or six simultaneously occupied temporal axes. This distinction makes the framework more specific than a general claim that everything changes: it asks how a world of persistent relations can be generated before its spatial representation is taken for granted. ^[2]

03The comparator’s explanatory structure

Panpsychist approaches make experiential or protoexperiential properties fundamental and widespread. Cosmopsychism gives priority to a cosmic experiential whole. These positions face different explanatory directions: combining many experiences into one subject and accounting for distinct subjects within an experiential whole. Shani’s cosmopsychism offers an original philosophical treatment of the second route.

SMM’s one source is structurally closer to a top-down dependence than to a collection of independent micro-subjects, but a nonspatial generative source is not automatically a cosmic consciousness. The additional experiential claim must be stated. A useful example is a shared database accessed through separate permissions: one information source can support several perspectives, yet nothing about permissions alone establishes that those perspectives feel like anything. A source theory needs both individuation and an account of experience. Cosmopsychism can sharpen that task, while DTT contributes an explicit interest in how differentiated access and temporal histories are generated. ^[1]

04The precise agreement and difference

Cosmopsychism can interpret local experiences as dependent manifestations of a continuing experiential whole. SMM/DTT offers a related image of renewal from one source, but adds a proposed temporal organization of production. The shared question is how a local perspective persists when its contents change. The difference is whether the fundamental whole is assumed to be experiential or is first specified as a generator.

DTT’s record inheritance can help explain continuity of perspective: a new completion can preserve commitments, memories and access relations from an earlier one. Yet this structural continuity is not automatically numerical identity of a subject. A copied record could preserve the same contents in two successors. Cosmopsychism therefore presses DTT to explain why renewal yields this continuing subject rather than a new subject with inherited memories. SMM contributes a concrete framework for asking the question, while the experiential ontology adds a further demand. The comparison is strongest when it distinguishes renewal of forms, renewal of physical processes and persistence of first-person ownership instead of treating all three as one phenomenon. ^[1]

05Worked example: what follows and what does not

A river maintains a recognizable course while different parcels of water pass through it. Calling it the same river can track location, causal continuity, ecological organization or a legal identity. None requires the same water molecules to remain. Now imagine a sequence of perfectly similar rivers with no causal relation between them. Similarity alone would not supply the history of one river. The comparison shows what a renewal theory needs: an inheritance relation that explains why a later configuration continues this process. SMM/DTT can express that relation through source memory and completion. The analogy establishes a criterion for persistence, not a physical proof that the universe is recreated in discrete frames.

06What this comparison contributes

The strongest version of renewal explains stability rather than merely challenging it. It identifies what is invariant across completions, what can vary, and why one completed state counts as the successor of another. Philosophical traditions differ over whether the dependence is temporal, ontological or both. Comparing these options gives DTT a clearer account of creation without forcing every language of sustaining dependence into the mathematics of a rapid physical update.

THE SAME QUESTION, DIFFERENT STARTING POINTS

The comparison at a glance

Continue on SMONAD

• The Principle of Ever-renewed Creation →

  Connects this comparison with the author’s discussion of renewal.

• Renewal and persistence: why a changing world can keep a history →

  Connects this comparison with the author’s discussion of renewal.

• Creation Scenario: the World as a Movie →

  Connects this comparison with the author’s discussion of renewal.

• Time Chest →

  Connects this comparison with the author’s discussion of renewal.

• source and memory →

  Connects this comparison with the author’s discussion of renewal.