The Duality of Time Theory, that results from the Single Monad Model of the Cosmos, explains how physical multiplicity is emerging from absolute (metaphysical) Oneness, at every instance of our normal time! This leads to the Ultimate Symmetry of space and its dynamic formation and breaking into the physical and psychical (supersymmetrical) creations, in orthogonal time directions. General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are complementary consequences of the Duality of Time Theory, and all the fundamental interactions become properties of the new granular complex-time geometry, at different dimensions. - => Conference Talk - Another Conference [Detailed Presentation]
Complex-Time Geometry and Perpetual Creation of Space
Shortly after the conquest by Alexander in 331 BC, the Babylonian knowledge was transferred to the Greeks. Accordingly, Aristarchus presented the first known model that placed the Sun at the center of the known universe with the Earth revolving around it, but his astronomical ideas were rejected in favor of Aristotle and Ptolemy whose geocentric model continued into the early modern age, until it was gradually superseded again by the current heliocentric model due the efforts of Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler in the 16th century.
Hipparchus and Ptolemy used complete list of eclipse observations covering many centuries, compiled from the Chaldean clay tablets recording all relevant observations of the various relations between the periods of the planets. These relations that Ptolemy attributes to Hipparchus in Almagest had all already been used in predictions found on Babylonian clay tablets.
In the earliest Greek literature we can find some references to various identifiable stars and constellations. Among others, the Hyades and Pleiads star clusters, and the constellations of Orion and Ursa Major, are mentioned in the Iliad and the Odyssey by Homer, hinting a rudimentary cosmology of a flat earth where stars rise and disappear into the ocean. However, in Pre-Socratic philosophy, Anaximander (610-546 BC) described a cylindrical earth suspended in the center of the cosmos, surrounded by rings of fire, while the Pythagorean philosopher Philolaus (480-405 BC) described the cosmos with stars and planets circling an unseen central fire.
The word “planet”in Greek means “wanderer”, because they were observed moving across the sky in relation to the other apparently fixed stars. The five planets: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, can be seen with the naked eye, in addition to the Sun and Moon, to make a total of seven celestial objects that appear and disappear from time to time. Early Greeks thought that the evening and morning appearances of Venus represented two different objects, but Pythagoras (570-495 BC) is credited for realization that both were actually the same planet.
The Pythagoreans placed astronomy among the four mathematical arts, along with arithmetic, geometry, and music, while Plato proposed that the seemingly chaotic wandering motions of the planets could be explained by combinations of uniform circular motions centered on a spherical Earth. In his main books on cosmology, Timaeus and the Republic, he described a two-sphere model and said there were eight circles or spheres carrying the seven planets and the fixed stars.
In the 5th and 4th century BC, many celebrated philosophers shaped the Classical Greek philosophy, including Socrates (469-399 BC), his student Plato (424-348 BC) and his student Aristotle (384-322 BC). The first was “the first who brought philosophy down from the heavens, placed it in cities, introduced it into families, and obliged it to examine into life and morals, and good and evil.” Reale and Catan (1987). Plato was the most distinguished student of Socrates, and the primary source of information about his thinking that he presented in his dialogues. In his turn, Aristotle was also the most renowned student who joined Plato’s Academy, though he widely disagreed with him and criticized his theory of forms as “empty words and poetic metaphors.” Prior (2016). We shall come across the fundamental philosophical and cosmological ideas of these philosophers in the following sections. Parmenides and his student Zeno, who lived also in this active era, will be also mentioned in sections 4 and 5 below.
In the 3rd century BC, Aristarchus, proposed a heliocentric model of the solar system, placing the Sun, not the Earth, at the center of the known universe, hence he is sometimes known as the “Greek Copernicus”, but his astronomical ideas were not well-received. In his only work to have survived, he calculated the sizes of the Sun and Moon, and their distances from the Earth, but his results are drastically underestimated.
In the 2nd century BC, Hipparchus used the Babylonian observations and predictions to create better geometrical models. He is considered among the most important Greek astronomers, because he introduced the concept of exact prediction into astronomy, and he was the last innovative astronomer before Ptolemy. Among many other achievements, he developed trigonometry and produced accurate models for the motion of the Sun and Moon, confirming the accurate values for the periods of its motion that Chaldean astronomers are widely presumed to have possessed before him.
![]() |
![]() |
... Space Transcendence Read this short concise exploration of the Duality of Time Postulate: DoT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics ...
... o time. So in fact there is no gradual motion in the common sense that the object leaves its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. MOTION OCCURS as a result of discrete change and not infinitesimal transmutation, so the observed ob ...
... d half that distance. Yet in the end the arrow reaches the target, moving at an average positive speed, which means that the sum of zeros is not equal to zero: ! Figure 2.2: If space is not INFINITELY DIVISIBLE , the distance from start to target is composed of discrete points. At any discr ...
... her point another time, and at appropriate points between those two points for intervening times. In this view, motion is a function of position with respect to time. So in fact there is no GRADUAL MOTION in the common sense that the object leaves its place to occupy new adjacent places, b ...
... Salmon (2001). The strength of the Single Monad Model comes exactly from its innovative explanation of this “miraculous way†of the “change of position†without ACTUAL MOTION . This offers what is known as the “at-at theory of motionâ€, which agrees t ...
... ervening times. In this view, motion is a function of position with respect to time. So in fact there is no gradual motion in the common sense that the object leaves its place to occupy new ADJACENT PLACES , but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. motion occurs as a resu ...
... its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. motion occurs as a result of discrete change and not infinitesimal transmutation, so the OBSERVED OBJECTS are always at rest in the different positions that they appear in. This will be dis ...
... its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. motion occurs as a result of discrete change and not infinitesimal transmutation, so the OBSERVED OBJECT s are always at rest in the different positions that they appear in. This will be dis ...
... oints between those two points for intervening times. In this view, motion is a function of position with respect to time. So in fact there is no gradual motion in the common sense that the OBJECT LEAVES its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those ne ...
... o gradual motion in the common sense that the object leaves its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. motion occurs as a result of DISCRETE CHANGE and not infinitesimal transmutation, so the observed objects are always at rest in t ...
... o time. So in fact there is no gradual motion in the common sense that the object leaves its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. MOTION OCCUR s as a result of discrete change and not infinitesimal transmutation, so the observed ob ...
... common sense that the object leaves its place to occupy new adjacent places, but it is successively re-created in those new places, i.e. motion occurs as a result of discrete change and not INFINITESIMAL TRANSMUTATION , so the observed objects are always at rest in the different positions t ...
I have no doubt that this is the most significant discovery in the history of mathematics, physics and philosophy, ever!
By revealing the mystery of the connection between discreteness and contintuity, this novel understanding of the complex (time-time) geometry, will cause a paradigm shift in our knowledge of the fundamental nature of the cosmos and its corporeal and incorporeal structures.
Enjoy reading...
Mohamed Haj Yousef
Check this detailed video presentation on "Deriving the Principles of Special, General and Quantum Relativity Based on the Single Monad Model Cosmos and Duality of Time Theory".
Download the Book "DOT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics" or: READ ONLINE .....>>>>