Assumptions, results and research status
A guide to the conditional gauge research programme.
Use one convention and keep the units visible
The exercises progress from linear algebra to finite spectra and the logic of continuum estimates. They use the same active-frame convention as the articles. The short solutions identify the actual mathematical object being calculated; an exact model result should not be promoted into a stronger physical claim.
For numerical checks, start with the linked explorer’s default setting, change only the inputs named in the problem, and export the result if you want to retain it. The values printed here are rounded. The original sources and their version notes are listed in the reference library.
1. Derive the endpoint transformation law
Question. Let ψᵧ = Uᵧₓψₓ and let ψ′ₓ = gₓψₓ, ψ′ᵧ = gᵧψᵧ. Find the matrix describing the same transport in the new frames.
Open the worked solution
Insert ψₓ = gₓ⁻¹ψ′ₓ into the original relation and multiply the target by gᵧ:
Both endpoints matter. A loop based at x has the same initial and final frame, so the internal frame changes cancel and W′ = gₓWgₓ⁻¹. Cyclicity of the trace then proves Tr W′ = Tr W.
2. Recover the connection law from a short link
Question. Use Uₓ₊dx,ₓ = I − A(x)dx + O(dx²) and g(x + dx) = g(x) + (dg/dx)dx + O(dx²). Derive A′.
Open the worked solution
Expand the endpoint law to first order:
Matching I − A′dx gives A′ = gAg⁻¹ − (dg)g⁻¹. This agrees with D′(gψ) = gDψ for D = d + A. A convention with a Hermitian physical potential or inverse frame coordinates must be converted before comparing signs.
3. A central loop distinguishes two measurements
Question. Set the two SU(2) link angles to a = b = π/2. Evaluate the normalized loop trace, interferometer dark-port probability and forced singlet-return probability.
Open the worked solution
The identity Re Tr W/2 = 1 − 2sin²a sin²b gives −1, so W = −I for this family. The Wilson cost is 1 − (−1) = 2. The dark-port probability is [1 − (−1)]/2 = 1, while the forced-return probability is |−1|² = 1.
At W = I the dark port instead has probability zero but the forced-return probability remains one. Squaring the amplitude has discarded the sign that the interference reference can detect. Verify this with the central-loop and commuting presets.
4. Measure finite-time selector completion
Question. Let E be an idempotent conditional expectation and Φₜ = E + exp(−γt)(id − E). Calculate ΦₜΦₛ and the coefficient of the uncompleted component at γt = log 100.
Open the worked solution
Use E² = E, E(id − E) = 0 and (id − E)² = id − E. The product is E + exp[−γ(t+s)](id − E), so the channels form the stated semigroup. At γt = log 100, the remaining coefficient is 1/100.
This is a quantitative approximation to the declared completion channel. A finite positive time does not make the residual coefficient exactly zero, and the channel is not a reversible unitary conjugation. The full source also specifies which carrier correlations it retains.
5. Count the stabilizer dimensions
Question. Calculate the real dimensions of U(5), U(3) × U(2), S(U(3) × U(2)) and SU(3) × SU(2). Explain each reduction.
Open the worked solution
The real dimension of U(n) is n². Thus the combined carrier gives 25 dimensions and separate blocks give 9 + 4 = 13. Fixing the product determinant imposes one real phase condition, leaving 12. Fixing each determinant separately removes two, leaving 8 + 3 = 11.
The difference is information retained, not an arithmetic inconsistency. A combined metric permits cross-block mixing. Separate blocks remove that mixing; volume tensors then remove one or two independent phase freedoms.
6. Check the global quotient for a conjugate up quark
Question. In the all-left-handed convention, uᶜ has q = −4, color triality t₃ = 2 and weak parity t₂ = 0. Does it descend through the stated ℤ₆ quotient?
Open the worked solution
The residue is q + 2t₃ + 3t₂ = −4 + 4 + 0 = 0. The generator of the kernel therefore acts trivially on this representation, so it descends. A conjugate triplet must use triality two rather than the fundamental triality one.
For Q with q = 1, t₃ = 1 and t₂ = 1, the sum is six and also vanishes modulo six. Changing only Q’s charge to zero gives residue five and fails this global test, even though the dimensions of the representation spaces have not changed.
7. Bracket the physical singlet root
Question. Let λ* be the maximum of the 4m free eigenvalues. Show why the secular root z lies between λ* + Δ/(4m) and λ* + Δ.
Open the worked solution
The secular sum is strictly decreasing for z > λ*. At the lower endpoint, a term corresponding to λ* already contributes one to (Δ/4m)Σ(z − λ)⁻¹, and the other terms are positive. At the upper endpoint every denominator is at least Δ, so the whole sum is at most one.
Continuity and monotonicity give a unique crossing in the interval, including any equality at the upper endpoint. This bracket selects the physical eigenvalue without choosing among ambiguous polynomial roots. At t = 0 all free eigenvalues vanish and z = Δ exactly.
8. Keep the Hessian normalization consistent
Question. For W = diag(exp(iθ),exp(−iθ),1), evaluate Tr X² where W = exp(iX), and relate the small-angle energy shift to κ̂₃.
Open the worked solution
Choose X = diag(θ, −θ, 0). Then Tr X² = 2θ², so the convention ΔE = ½κ̂₃Tr X² + O(X⁴) gives ΔE = κ̂₃θ² + O(θ⁴). The finite-difference ratio ΔE/θ² therefore tends to κ̂₃, not twice that value.
At t/Δ = 0.1, the exact coefficient is approximately 0.00006277560191Δ. The leading weak-hopping coefficient is 2(0.1)⁴Δ/3 ≈ 0.00006666666667Δ. Their difference is expected at nonzero hopping because the latter keeps only the leading term.
9. Derive the central trace weights
Question. Use Q = diag(−2I₃, 3I₂). Calculate Tr Q² and the central quadratic response from block coefficients κ₃ and κ₂.
Open the worked solution
The first block contributes 3 × 4 = 12 and the second 2 × 9 = 18, so Tr Q² = 30. If the block quadratic form carries the respective response weights, its value on Q is 12κ₃ + 18κ₂.
For equal penalties and hopping in the exact model, κ̂ₘ is proportional to 1/m, so κ̂₂/κ̂₃ = 3/2. These statements concern a specified trace convention and model response. A measured coupling requires the additional action and scale matching.
10. Differentiate a projector without losing its curvature
Question. Differentiate P² = P and prove P(dP)P = 0. Does that imply the bundle connection vanishes?
Open the worked solution
Differentiation gives (dP)P + P(dP) = dP. Multiply on both sides by P to obtain 2P(dP)P = P(dP)P, hence P(dP)P = 0. The connection on a section s = Ps is ∇s = P ds, which differentiates the moving section as well as its subspace.
The curvature P(dP ∧ dP)P contains two derivatives and can connect through the complementary space between them. A vanishing once-sandwiched derivative therefore does not imply zero curvature. In a local frame, A = u†du provides the corresponding potential.
11. Evaluate a finite projection loop
Question. Take θ = π/3, so b = sin²(θ/2) = 1/4. Compare N = 7 and N = 16 projections with the continuous phase.
Open the worked solution
The continuous phase is −2πb = −π/2 ≈ −1.570796327. At N = 7 the forward product gives phase approximately −1.487567709 and survival probability 0.3445680152. At N = 16 the phase is approximately −1.555509589 and survival probability 0.6291609396.
The probability tends to one and the phase tends to the continuous value as the same loop is sampled more finely. The count N is a discretization input. It is independent of the interpretation of the six inner generative levels.
12. Reproduce the one-generation charge sums
Question. Use dimensions (6,3,3,2,1,1) and charges q = (1,−4,2,−3,6,0) for Q,uᶜ,dᶜ,L,eᶜ,νᶜ. Calculate Σdq and Σdq³.
Open the worked solution
Σdq³ = 6 − 192 + 24 − 54 + 216 = 0.
The mixed coefficients also vanish: 2(1) − 4 + 2 = 0 for SU(3)²U(1), and 3(1) − 3 = 0 for SU(2)²U(1). There are three colored quark doublets and one lepton doublet, an even total of four for the stated Witten test.
The representations and chirality convention were supplied before doing the sums. Cancellation verifies these inputs rather than deriving them.
13. Change one charge and find the failure
Question. Keep all initial charges except qL, which changes from −3 to −2. Which displayed anomaly coefficients become nonzero?
Open the worked solution
The weak mixed coefficient becomes 3(1) − 2 = 1. The gravitational coefficient changes by 2[−2 − (−3)] = 2. The cubic Abelian coefficient changes by 2[(−2)³ − (−3)³] = 2(−8 + 27) = 38.
The SU(3) coefficients remain unchanged because the lepton doublet is a color singlet. The fixed non-Abelian representations still contain four weak doublets, but L’s quotient residue changes as well. Local anomaly sums and global quotient descent are separate diagnostics.
14. Show why the auxiliary twist has no unconditional floor
Question. For N sites on a circle of length L, use the charged k = 0 mode λ₀(θ) = 4N²sin²(θ/2N)/L². Expand for small θ.
Open the worked solution
Since sin x = x + O(x³), λ₀(θ) = θ²/L² + O(θ⁴/(N²L²)). Its value approaches zero with the twist, even when N and L are fixed. For the neutral sector θ = 0 it is exactly zero.
Compactness of the circle alone therefore does not give a lower bound uniform over all charged twists approaching identity. A restricted fiber window can have a bound under extra assumptions, but the physical Hamiltonian still requires vacuum and mixing control.
15. Positive diagonals can give a negative eigenvalue
Question. Take H = [[1,2.5],[2.5,4]] and threshold z = 0. Calculate the Schur complement and the lower eigenvalue.
Open the worked solution
The high block is positive, d − z = 4. The Schur complement is F(0) = 1 − 6.25/4 = −0.5625, so H is not positive semidefinite. Direct diagonalization gives λ₋ = (5 − √34)/2 ≈ −0.415475947.
Both diagonal blocks are positive, but the mixing defeats the low bound. This is the simplest illustration of why eliminating a high sector must keep the induced negative term and control it quantitatively.
16. Complete the projected vacuum
Question. In the two-state vacuum example take p = 1/2, t = 0.2 and r = 0.8. Calculate the corrected blocks and their Schur value.
Open the worked solution
Here r − t = 0.6, so A = D = 0.3 and B = −0.3. Then A − B²/D = 0.3 − 0.09/0.3 = 0. The vanishing value expresses the projected vacuum’s zero-energy completion.
Using the uncorrected off-diagonal mixing gives (1 − t)²(1 − p)/(r − t) = 0.5333333333, which is larger than the correct 0.3 by the ratio 16/9. The punctured low window has rank zero in this example, so no positive nontrivial low-window bound follows from the puncture alone.
17. Distinguish a fixed finite cutoff from a Weyl limit
Question. Let a fixed projection retain M eigenvalues λ₁,…,λM of a nonnegative operator. Evaluate lims→0 Σexp(−sλj).
Open the worked solution
Each of the finitely many terms tends to one, so the limit is M. A divergent power law s⁻ᵈᐟ² cannot arise from this fixed finite list. Such an asymptotic requires the corresponding infinite-dimensional trace, a growing cutoff with a stated limiting order, or another explicitly defined normalization such as a per-volume trace.
The order of limits is part of a spectral-action argument. A finite numerical fit over a chosen range is useful evidence for that range, but it is not by itself an infinite-spectrum theorem.
18. A positive gap at every regulator can still vanish
Question. Suppose a family of two-state Hamiltonians has eigenvalues 0 and 1/n at regulator n. Does each Hamiltonian have a positive gap? Does the family have a positive lower bound independent of n?
Open the worked solution
For each finite n the excitation gap is 1/n > 0. The infimum over the family is zero, so no positive n-independent lower bound follows. A uniform continuum claim requires a different estimate or a physical rescaling justified by the model’s unit convention.
This simple sequence explains the logical role of uniformity without purporting to model the gauge dynamics. In the actual programme, volume, spatial spacing, auxiliary spacing, physical time step and retained sectors all have to be tracked in the required order.
Turn an exercise into a research question
An exercise fixes enough assumptions to make a short answer possible. To extend one, identify the assumption you intend to relax and decide what kind of conclusion would survive. For example, replace an exactly fixed local algebra with an approximately fixed one; add a controlled link fluctuation to the singlet Hamiltonian; or construct a vacuum window with nonzero punctured rank.
The collaboration page lists several such projects. A precise counterexample or a verified special case can make progress even when the complete source-to-field-theory construction remains open.
19. Check unchanged marginals and changed correlations
For ρ = s|Φ+⟩⟨Φ+| + (1−s)I₄/4, calculate both marginals, purity and ⟨σz⊗σz⟩ at s = 1/2.
Worked answer
Both partial traces equal I₂/2. In the Bell basis the eigenvalues are (1+3s)/4 and three copies of (1−s)/4. Hence Tr ρ² = (1+3s²)/4 = 7/16, while the joint zz correlation is s = 1/2. The unchanged marginals therefore do not fix this joint statistic. They also do not prove that the channel fixes each full carrier algebra for arbitrary inputs.
20. Locate the Bell-mixture partial-transpose threshold
Find the partial-transpose eigenvalues of the same state and the first γt at which its negativity vanishes when s = exp(−γt).
Worked answer
The partial transpose has three eigenvalues (1+s)/4 and one eigenvalue (1−3s)/4. Its negativity is max[0,(3s−1)/4]. It vanishes once s ≤ 1/3, so the threshold is γt = log 3. This finite entanglement threshold differs from exact depolarization: s remains positive at every finite time when γ is finite and positive.
21. Vary geometry while preserving the spectrum
For Z = diag(x+iβy,x−iβy), evaluate Fxy and −Tr(Fxy²) at x=y=0 for β=1 and β=0. Keep H=Δ(I−P) with Δ=2.
Worked answer
At the origin Fxy = diag(2iβ,−2iβ), so −Tr(Fxy²) = 8β². The two cases give invariant values 8 and 0. In both cases H has eigenvalues 0,0,2,2. Equal eigenvalues and equal separating gaps have not selected equal bundle curvature.
22. Compute a loop with zero trace curvature
For β=1 and the counterclockwise coordinate circle of radius R=1 in the same rank-two graph, calculate the parallel holonomy.
Worked answer
The diagonal connection integrates to diag(iπ,−iπ), since the flux magnitude is 2πR²/(1+R²) = π. With D=d+A, parallel transport is exp(−∮A), so W=diag(exp(−iπ),exp(iπ))=−I₂. The determinant holonomy is one and Tr F is zero, while the rank-two holonomy is nontrivial. This is separate from the determinant-line flat-holonomy counterexample on a circle.
23. Calculate a positive punctured Schur coefficient
Take p=1/2, t₁=0.2, t₂=0.5, r=0.8 and α=π/4 in the three-state vacuum model. Evaluate the high block and punctured coefficient.
Worked answer
Set a=r−t₁=0.6 and b=r−t₂=0.3. Then k=a cos²α+b sin²α=0.45, the high block is D=pk=0.225, and c=ab/k=0.4. The exact low Schur matrix is diag(0,0.4). Its zero direction is the projected vacuum; the punctured low space is spanned by the second coordinate and has rank one.
24. Compare a transfer threshold with the toy excitation gap
For the same transfer eigenvalues 1,0.2,0.5 and r=0.8, calculate the excitation gap and threshold energy in inverse transfer-step units.
Worked answer
The gap is −log(max(0.2,0.5)) = log 2 ≈ 0.69314718. The threshold energy is −log(0.8) ≈ 0.22314355, leaving an energy margin log(1.6) ≈ 0.47000363. The positive Schur coefficient 0.4 is a dimensionless threshold-form quantity, not that logarithmic energy margin. Converting either into a physical prediction requires an independently specified time step and model correspondence.
Sources for this guide
- Completed records, v21
- Temporal completion and exact loops, v20
- Sevenfold reconstruction, v18
- Vacuum obstruction and form Feshbach, v2
- Conditional interactions and unification, v1
Source manuscripts, version notes, and standard references are listed in the reference library.

